Fuji XF Lenses: Part Three – The XF60

I think it’s high time that I continued my musings on Fuji’s lenses.

You might recall that I was fortunate that Fuji PT lent me a 56 APD for a while, but I’ve also written about the glass I actually own!

Previously I’ve written about the XF27 (click here) and the XF18 (click here)

Now I think it’s time to talk about the 60!

Now originally I owned the X-Pro1 and the 3 “original” primes, which are the XF18/35F1.4/60 and I also had the 27

With the exception of the 35 F1.4, those other lenses weren’t always so highly regarded throughout the Fuji X community!

The reasons not to like the 18 and 27 are fairly straightforward…

The 18 is a bit soft in the corners and requires quite a lot of native software correction for distortion

The 27 is quite a slow lens (F2.8) and doesn’t have an aperture ring.

But the 60 is also derided, despite the fact it has an aperture ring, and is a sharp lens.

Sure the 60 is a little bit slow at F2.4, but that’s on 60mm (about 90mm FF equivalent) so the 60 is still capable of decent amounts of subject isolation.

The 60 is also quite small, not especially expensive when compared to some of the later prime lenses and comes with a metal hood.

It also offers 1:2 “macro” (as of March 2017, a feature that Fuji have yet to surpass with any other XF prime)

So despite being, small, well made, inexpensive, sharp and able to close focus, the diminutive inaugural mid-tele from Fuji isn’t everyone’s darling.

But why?

Well the 60 had (well has really) one bugbear, one sticking point that painfully jarred with the wants of the average modern photographer…

It’s dog slow to operate via Auto Focus.

Don’t get me wrong… none of the original 3 primes are exactly speedy Gonzales in the AF department, but the 60, the 60 really took the biscuit, in fact biscuits were probably the best subject for the 60, because the 60 focuses closely and biscuits don’t move! 🙂

Of course Fuji being Fuji, the lens was given FW updates and the camera bodies got better with AF, and now; 5 years later, the 60 isn’t anywhere near as S-L-O-W as it was back at the time of release.

But it’s still slow. It’s still not a true 1:1 macro. It’s still only F2.4

These days people are spoilt for better choice for mid length teles within Fuji’s range.

There’s the 56mm and 56 APD. There’s the 90mm and also the “pro” zooms make decent mid length lenses.

It would seem the last vestige of the 60 is price (and even that’s a lot more then it was when it was first released!)

So does that resign the 60 to the bargain basement? Suitable only for those tight of budget and impatiently waiting for Fuji to release a 1:1 macro?

Well… in a way… Yes..

I don’t think for a moment that the newer tele primes (the 56 and 90, and to a certain extent the XF50F2) aren’t better lenses; with faster apertures and faster AF, but this doesn’t suddenly make the 60 a poor lens, it just means that there’s now more dedicated mid-tele length lenses available from Fuji.

But the thing is… I’ve had a soft spot for the 60 from when I first got a copy (a copy I still have) 3 years ago!

To me the 60 is just a ‘jack of all’ decently performing lens.

It might not have the headline grabbing aperture of the 56, and certainly not the AF performance of the new XF50F2.

But it just gets on with the job of being a mid length tele with the ability to close focus.

It’s a sharp lens, the rendering is nice, due in part to the 60 having 9 aperture blades, which makes for a smoother out of focus area.

I can’t deny that on many occasions I’ve lusted after the 56 (especially the APD version), and thought about selling my 60 on, and putting the funds into the 56. Been very close to that a few times…

…and I can’t deny, I’m sure that I will one day

But as much as I like the 56 I also like the close focus of the 60 and I like how it renders, and the slower AF doesn’t bother me, and longer than 35mm (50mm equivalent) isn’t a length I use that much anyway

Still I can see a 56 in my future!

So as ever with these lens articles, I’ll show you what an uncorrected RAW file looks like, then share some shots taken with the 60

So with that said – let’s take a quick look under the corrected image!

I know this isn’t my usual tiles shot 🙂 – I’m not at home this week!

Anyway, as you can see without software correction the 60 exhibits some distortion and perhaps some vignetting.

OK, that’s the tiles now let’s see some shots!

The Watcher
Yes – it’s our Cat. Yes – some of you hate that. Bite me. The 60 may not be a 56, but it can do subject isolation and the out of focus areas are very smooth.

DSCF0949_v1
Yes the 60 may not be a full bodied 1:1 macro. But it can still get pretty close, sometimes closer than you’d like!

My Shed
60mm (90 equivalent) can sometimes feel a bit of strange focal length if you’re used to anything wider. Sometimes it’s just perfect to fill the frame.

Royal Helicopter
I often champion the virtues of the X-Pro range for reportage, and happening upon the Royal Helicopter taking off was a shot not to be wasted. Again; a good focal length to fill the frame even from quite far back

Before the Big Jump
More reportage, this time shooting the Ribeira kids as they prepare to jump into the Douro river

Monument
To my eye and for my tastes, I find the 60 plenty sharp, with good colour, contrast and fine details

Playtime Over?
It won’t give the background blur and subject isolation of the 56 (alas!) but you can still capture a fairly dreamy looking image with the 60

River Boat
When things are quite far away, I’m definitely glad that I have the 60 on hand for the extra reach

Kiosk Guy
Part of my street portraits series, the first shot with the 60! Personally I think the 60 takes a good portrait, of course YMMV!

So that’s the 60.

And for my opinion the question boils down to a simple one.

Can you live with slow AF? It’s not that bad on the newer cameras and with the very latest firmware. But make no mistake, it certainly can be ponderous, I’ve made it AF track SLOW moving things, whilst mounted on my X-Pro2, and it was appreciably quicker on my X-T1, than it was on my X-Pro1

Of course if you really need the light gathering and creative possibilities that the F1.2 of the 56 offers, then I suspect the 60 holds little interest for you.

But if you’re not so in need of the F1.2, and instead need a competent mid length tele, that in plentiful light can turn it’s hand to many subjects at varying distances; doesn’t take up a lot of space in the bag and doesn’t cost the Earth, then the 60 could just be worth a longer look.

======================================
PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE

A lot of time and effort goes into this site.. If you like what you see, and/or if I’ve helped you then perhaps you’d consider helping me?

One way you could help me is if you want to buy ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING from Amazon, (that’s anything; cameras, books, shoe polish, whatever) if you do so using the links below, then I will receive a small percentage of your expenditure, and you will pay NO MORE than you would have paid anyway.

Amazon USA Any Product

Amazon UK Any Product

This will also work if you USE THOSE LINKS to click through to your own country.

To do this, click a link above, scroll to the bottom of the page, then select your country from the drop down menu, as shown below

Another way you could help, especially if you don’t like Amazon, but do like me, is by making a donation

The donate button is in the top right hand corner or can be found on the link below

Thanks Very Much!

Donate
======================================

The X-Pro Series Content: Referenced and All In One Place

Back to Page One

Back to Page Two

Back to Page Three

Back to Page Four

Back to Page Five

Back to Page Six

Back to Page Seven

Back to Page Eight

Back to Page Nine

Back to Page Ten

Back to Page Eleven

Back to Page Twelve

Back to Page Thirteen

Back to Page Fourteen

Back to Page Fifteen

Back to Page Sixteen

Back to Page Seventeen

Back to Page Eighteen

Back to Page Nineteen

Back to Page Twenty

Back to Page Twenty One

Back to Page Twenty Two

Back to Page Twenty Three

Back to Page Twenty Four

Back to Page Twenty Five

Back to Page Twenty Six

Back to Page Twenty Seven

Back to Page Twenty Eight

Back to Page Twenty Nine

Back to Page Thirty (The Start of the 100% X-Pro2 Content)

Back to Page Thirty One

Back to Page Thirty Two

Back to Page Thirty Three

Back to Page Thirty Four

Back to Page Thirty Five

Back to Page Thirty Six

Back to Page Thirty Seven

Back to Page Thirty Eight

Back to Page Thirty Nine

Back to Page Forty

Back to Page Forty One

Back to Page Forty Two

Back to Page Forty Three

Back to Page Forty Four

Back to Page Forty Five

Back to Page Forty Six

Back to Page Forty Seven

Back to Page Forty Eight

Back to Page Forty Nine

Back to Page Fifty

Back to Page Fifty One

Back to Page Fifty Two

Back to Page Fifty Three

Back to Page Fifty Four

Back to Page Fifty Five

Back to Page Fifty Six

Back to Page Fifty Seven

Back to Page Fifty Eight

Back to Page Fifty Nine

Back to Page Sixty

Back to Page Sixty One

My Blog Click Blog Table of Contents

Other Stories Click Pages and Articles

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Fuji XF Lenses: Part Three – The XF60”

  1. I was thinking of buying the new 50mm. Was a little worried that the 60mm was too close for me. I seldom take pictures without people seeing me taking pictures, (I ask) so I have to be close . . . But I decided for a (second hand) 60mm. Took it to the Carnaval to test it AF speed on my speedy X-Pro1! Maybe I would sell it afterwards . . . I still have it. Slow, not for me, I really didn’t notice any problems for my kind of photography. So for me it’s a keeper. And I love the bokeh! Maybe I’m going to like to shoot macro . . .

    Like

  2. I purchased the 60mm 2.4 about two weeks, brand new, at the fabulous price of 479.00 US. I owned the 56 1.2 and hated it, so I returned it; the decision I had to make was between the 50 F2 and the 60. The sixty, though still too slow to focus, was my choice as a multi-purpose lens due to it’s near Macro capabilities — though my 16 1.4 focuses closer believe it or not. Since I don’t shoot action or sports, I’m ok with the focusing, and the darn thing is TACK sharp wide open at 2.4 For the price I paid I couldn’t be happier!

    Like

    1. That sounds like a great deal, the 60 costs a lot more than that in GBP! (and 1 GBP is worth more than a dollar)

      The 16 does focus closer than the 60 – the XF18 does too. But the magnification on the wide lenses isn’t anything to compare to the 60.

      The cat shot (and others) from the article is F2.4 and that’s a sharp picture, yes the 60 is a good and versatile lens and I’m sure you’ll enjoy it

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: